Earthnet google1/5/2024 ![]() This sign-in requirement creates the opportunity for Google to track individuals uniquely across sessions. Under the Earthlink / Google proposal, those who wish to use the advertising-supported service must register, and then sign in every time they wish to use the service. We urge the city to negotiate for such heightened privacy protections.Įnsure that individuals can use the free service without "signing in." We believe that the Earthlink / Google proposal can be improved so that its users are afforded reasonable privacy rights. The Earthlink / Google proposal performed relatively poorly on privacy metrics specified in our February 21st letter. On April 5, 2006, San Francisco TechConnect ranked the Earthlink / Google proposal as the most advantageous to the city. None of the remaining five proposals satisfied even half of the standards. One provider was compliant with the standards proposed in the February 21 letter. On April 3, 2006, EPIC and EFF provided a privacy analysis of the six proposals to provide the city with municipal broadband. We proposed a series of standards for a privacy-friendly network. We argued that privacy notices are not enough and that minimum standards are necessary for each of the privacy questions posed to proposers in order to guarantee respect for users' rights. On February 21, 2006, we stressed that the city should consider minimum standards for the privacy issues raised by the RFP. We applaud TechConnect for including the privacy issues we raised in RFP 2005-19. In that letter, we raised a series of privacy issues that sought to focus attention on whether users of the municipal broadband network will have secure and private access to the Internet. ![]() On October 19, 2005, the ACLU of Northern California, Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), and Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) submitted comments to TechConnect concerning privacy issues raised by municipal broadband access. Ensure that cameras and automated enforcement tools are used only for extremely narrowly-defined purposes, and that strict use, access and privacy policies are implemented and enforced.Ensure that Earthlink adopts a data retention schedule that routinely erases non-essential data.Such procedures would include notice to the individual before personal information is released to others. Ensure that Earthlink / Google agrees to fair procedures for addressing legal requests for personal information.Ensure that both companies do not share personal information without first obtaining voluntary, affirmative consent from the user.Ensure that individuals can use the free service without "signing in.". ![]() In this letter, we urge you to negotiate terms with Earthlink / Google in order to establish reasonable privacy rights for users of this network. In addition, the Earthlink / Google proposal seeks to create a surveillance infrastructure for San Francisco by allowing greater deployment of video cameras and automated enforcement tools, such as parking meters. Earthlink also partners with online profiling company Doubleclick. Google follows an opt-out model for disclosing individuals' information to third parties.Įarthlink discloses subscribers' personal information for marketing purposes, and engages in "enhancement," the purchasing of additional personal information on individuals without their knowledge or consent. They have to provide an email address to sign in, thus allowing Google to track individuals uniquely across sessions of Internet use. Users have no ability to opt out of this targeting. Google proposes to subsidize public Internet access by serving targeted advertisements to users. ![]() The selection of Earthlink / Google as a provider for municipal broadband access in San Francisco raises privacy issues. Re: TechConnect RFP 2005-19 Earthlink / Google and Privacy Department of Telecommunications and Information Services
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |